Thursday, August 28, 2008

Twilight, New Moon, Breaking Dawn

Yes, I've read them. I have very mixed feelings about them. Are they appropriate for children? No. Stephenie Meyer writes about seventeen year olds, and thus these books might be intended for seventeen year olds but that doesn't mean that these books are appropriate for young adults. I mean just because Edward and Bella don't do anything but kiss and clutch, they still share the same bed night after night, all the while keeping her father in the dark. Some have told me, "It's completely innocent." How can that be true when Bella herself says she loses control everytime their lips touch?

Let me backtrack...Bella moves to Forks, Washington after living in Phoenix, Arizona most of her life. Her first day at a new school, she notices the beautiful but distant Cullens family. She sits next to Edward Cullens in science and senses that he hates her. She also notices his black irises, (in his eyes, not flowers) and his extremely cold skin. Edward misses the next few days of school. Much of the story is told in the mind of Bella, not much action or dialogue compared to the inner workings of Bella's psyche.

Speeding things up, Bella falls for Edward, who now has topaz irises. She is warned to stay away from him and his family, by Billy Black who is fifteen year old Jacob's grandfather. Jacob tells Bella about his tribe's legends and why the Cullens aren't allowed on LaPush Reservation land. He refers to the Cullens as the "cold ones" and his own tribe as the protectors. Bella clues in and does some internet research on vampires.

She asks Edward about his "family" and learns that the Cullens are "vegetarian" vampires. They have chosen not to feed on human prey, rather they hunt wild game: grizzlies, mountain lions, elk. Vampires are created, not born (by surviving a vampire bite). Carlisle, the patriarch of this group, or "coven" of vampires was created by an attacking vampire in the 1600s. He has never taken a human life, and rather uses his superior senses to heal, working as a physician in the local hospital. The other vampires, Esme, Edward, Jasper, Alice, Emmet, and Rosalie were either created by Carlisle, because they were on the brink of human death, or created by others, led to Forks and willingly joined the Cullen way of life.

Now there are still plenty of other vampires, who murder innocent humans for food, and sometimes they visit the Cullens. But the Cullens respectfully ask them not to "hunt" in their area, so usually they go out of state. Jacob, and other young male members of his tribe, the Quileute tribe, have spontaneously starting changing into werewolves. They phase back and forth between human and wolf form, and strive to hunt vampires. We find out in the 4th book that they aren't actually werewolves but shape-shifters.

So that's the back story. I have not read the third installment, but the first two books are steeped with what Publishers' Weekly calls "sexual tension." I hate to criticize anyone's writing skill, but when Bella asks Edward in New Moon, "Do you want me for my body or my blood?" I actually laughed out loud. As far as an overall theme of good vs. evil, the plot of the book appears to be keep Bella alive, safe from friends, good vampires and bad ones, so that she and Edward can test their willpower while they fool around with each other's lips and bodies. There is some discussion of souls, heaven and hell and whether or not Edward believes he has a soul, which make these books slightly better than paperback horror/romances. Granted, in Breaking Dawn, Bella and Edward do wait until their wedding night, and she does choose to keep her half vampire baby against everyone's advice. However, her reckless moral behavior prevents her from becoming a true heroine. (I did not read the third book, Eclipse, as I do not want to spend my money on these, and the waiting list at the library is very long.)
Not Recommended.

5 comments:

  1. I haven't read any of these, but someone I know says the third is terrible.

    Sincerely,
    California Librarian

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for your review. My 14 yo dtr was sucked into the first one behind my back and cannot understand my concerns.

    A concerned Catholic mom

    ReplyDelete
  3. I totally agree with you about Twilight! I read the first one and half of the second one and when my girls are old enough they certainly will not be reading these books! Sure, they don't *do* anything but I think Bella is not a good role model. She's whiny and far too dependent on men. Also, I don't believe she and Edward have a healthy or appropriate relationship for 17 year olds. He is controlling!

    ReplyDelete
  4. What a wonderful blog you have! I just joined the Catholic Mom's blogroll as I am in the throes (as you say) of my first pregnancy (my husband and I are so excited!).

    I was wondering if you had any suggestions for the best books to read to newborns and infants?

    Thanks and God Bless!

    Sarah

    Http://fumblingtowardgrace.wordpress.com

    ReplyDelete
  5. I like your take on these. I have read these books myself "for fun". I, however, am a 37 year-old mother of three looking for escapist fiction. My friend asked me if she should let her daughter read them and I said "No way!" Bella is not a good role model, willing to give up everything (including her life and potentially, her soul) for Edward, whose only virtue for the first two books is that he is beautiful to look at.

    I did find them fun to read, although not literature by any means. But again, these are definitely NOT for teens or young adults.

    ReplyDelete

Thursday, August 28, 2008

Twilight, New Moon, Breaking Dawn

Yes, I've read them. I have very mixed feelings about them. Are they appropriate for children? No. Stephenie Meyer writes about seventeen year olds, and thus these books might be intended for seventeen year olds but that doesn't mean that these books are appropriate for young adults. I mean just because Edward and Bella don't do anything but kiss and clutch, they still share the same bed night after night, all the while keeping her father in the dark. Some have told me, "It's completely innocent." How can that be true when Bella herself says she loses control everytime their lips touch?

Let me backtrack...Bella moves to Forks, Washington after living in Phoenix, Arizona most of her life. Her first day at a new school, she notices the beautiful but distant Cullens family. She sits next to Edward Cullens in science and senses that he hates her. She also notices his black irises, (in his eyes, not flowers) and his extremely cold skin. Edward misses the next few days of school. Much of the story is told in the mind of Bella, not much action or dialogue compared to the inner workings of Bella's psyche.

Speeding things up, Bella falls for Edward, who now has topaz irises. She is warned to stay away from him and his family, by Billy Black who is fifteen year old Jacob's grandfather. Jacob tells Bella about his tribe's legends and why the Cullens aren't allowed on LaPush Reservation land. He refers to the Cullens as the "cold ones" and his own tribe as the protectors. Bella clues in and does some internet research on vampires.

She asks Edward about his "family" and learns that the Cullens are "vegetarian" vampires. They have chosen not to feed on human prey, rather they hunt wild game: grizzlies, mountain lions, elk. Vampires are created, not born (by surviving a vampire bite). Carlisle, the patriarch of this group, or "coven" of vampires was created by an attacking vampire in the 1600s. He has never taken a human life, and rather uses his superior senses to heal, working as a physician in the local hospital. The other vampires, Esme, Edward, Jasper, Alice, Emmet, and Rosalie were either created by Carlisle, because they were on the brink of human death, or created by others, led to Forks and willingly joined the Cullen way of life.

Now there are still plenty of other vampires, who murder innocent humans for food, and sometimes they visit the Cullens. But the Cullens respectfully ask them not to "hunt" in their area, so usually they go out of state. Jacob, and other young male members of his tribe, the Quileute tribe, have spontaneously starting changing into werewolves. They phase back and forth between human and wolf form, and strive to hunt vampires. We find out in the 4th book that they aren't actually werewolves but shape-shifters.

So that's the back story. I have not read the third installment, but the first two books are steeped with what Publishers' Weekly calls "sexual tension." I hate to criticize anyone's writing skill, but when Bella asks Edward in New Moon, "Do you want me for my body or my blood?" I actually laughed out loud. As far as an overall theme of good vs. evil, the plot of the book appears to be keep Bella alive, safe from friends, good vampires and bad ones, so that she and Edward can test their willpower while they fool around with each other's lips and bodies. There is some discussion of souls, heaven and hell and whether or not Edward believes he has a soul, which make these books slightly better than paperback horror/romances. Granted, in Breaking Dawn, Bella and Edward do wait until their wedding night, and she does choose to keep her half vampire baby against everyone's advice. However, her reckless moral behavior prevents her from becoming a true heroine. (I did not read the third book, Eclipse, as I do not want to spend my money on these, and the waiting list at the library is very long.)
Not Recommended.

5 comments:

  1. I haven't read any of these, but someone I know says the third is terrible.

    Sincerely,
    California Librarian

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for your review. My 14 yo dtr was sucked into the first one behind my back and cannot understand my concerns.

    A concerned Catholic mom

    ReplyDelete
  3. I totally agree with you about Twilight! I read the first one and half of the second one and when my girls are old enough they certainly will not be reading these books! Sure, they don't *do* anything but I think Bella is not a good role model. She's whiny and far too dependent on men. Also, I don't believe she and Edward have a healthy or appropriate relationship for 17 year olds. He is controlling!

    ReplyDelete
  4. What a wonderful blog you have! I just joined the Catholic Mom's blogroll as I am in the throes (as you say) of my first pregnancy (my husband and I are so excited!).

    I was wondering if you had any suggestions for the best books to read to newborns and infants?

    Thanks and God Bless!

    Sarah

    Http://fumblingtowardgrace.wordpress.com

    ReplyDelete
  5. I like your take on these. I have read these books myself "for fun". I, however, am a 37 year-old mother of three looking for escapist fiction. My friend asked me if she should let her daughter read them and I said "No way!" Bella is not a good role model, willing to give up everything (including her life and potentially, her soul) for Edward, whose only virtue for the first two books is that he is beautiful to look at.

    I did find them fun to read, although not literature by any means. But again, these are definitely NOT for teens or young adults.

    ReplyDelete